Current:Home > FinanceAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -InvestPro
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-23 13:34:53
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (95)
Related
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- YFN Lucci pleads guilty to gang-related charge, prosecution drops 12 counts in plea deal
- Police say a former Haitian vice-consul has been slain near an airport in Haiti
- Ariana Grande debuts at No. 1 on Billboard Hot 100 for sixth time, tying Taylor Swift
- 'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
- 'Locked in’: Ravens adopted QB Lamar Jackson’s motto while watching him ascend in 2023
- Netflix buys rights to WWE Raw, other shows in live streaming push
- Army doctor to face court martial following allegations of sexual abuse
- NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
- San Diegans cry, hug, outside damaged homes after stunning flash floods in normally balmy city
Ranking
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- Netflix’s gains 13M new global 4Q subscribers as it unwraps its best-ever holiday season results
- Man suspected of killing 8 outside Chicago fatally shoots self in Texas confrontation, police say
- Phoenix woman gets 37-year prison sentence in death of her baby from malnutrition, medical neglect
- 'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
- George Santos says he doesn’t plan to vote in the special election to fill his former seat
- What is Dixville Notch? Why a small New Hampshire town holds its primary voting at midnight
- Super Bowl 58 matchups ranked, worst to best: Which rematch may be most interesting game?
Recommendation
'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
Group sues Arkansas attorney general for not approving government records ballot measure
Norman Jewison, director and Academy Award lifetime achievement honoree, dead at 97
Business owners thought they would never reopen after Maine’s deadliest shooting. Then support grew
New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
J.Crew’s Extra 60% off Sale Features Elevated Staples & Statement Pieces, Starting at $9
Malaria mass-vaccination program launches in Cameroon, bringing hope as Africa battles surging infections
Love Is Blind Contestant Spots This Red Flag in Season 6 Trailer